Newspaper headlines are designed to capture a selective element of the news and can be misleading. They reach a large audience and their impact is
amplified by the broadcast media and social media so they can be read by hundreds of millions. Read more about the small number of powerful
individuals behind the headlines and the amplifying effect
that is so dangerous.
While newspaper circulation is in decline it is still significant. The Daily Mail reaches over 650,000 people every day.
But that's not all. The Mail Online is the most visited English-language newspaper in the world reaching nearly
200 million unique visitors in a month. Combined with all the other print publications in the UK and associated online presence
this is a massive reach.
And it doesn't stop there. Every day the broadcast media feature "tomorrow's front pages", so the headlines are
amplified to the 70% of UK adults getting
news from TV.
What does that do? It generates a massive amount of online discussion, amplifying the headlines even further, mostly just
repeating what the headlines wanted the audience to think.
In an ideal world this would not be a problem - indeed it could be a major contribution to a healthy democracy.
But 90% (and growing) of the UK-wide print media is owned and controlled by just three companies:
Reach plc (formerly Trinity Mirror), News UK and DMG Media, and behind those companies are a small group of very wealthy individuals
with strong political views, some of whom set the political agenda for their publications. Instead of journalism holding the powerful
to account, there are powerful individuals setting the political agenda with no democratic accountability.
So headlines do matter but reading behind them and challenging them matters even more.
Seen a slippery headline? Let us know
Have you ever wondered what drives all those misleading headlines, who those bigoted social media trolls really are,
and who stands to gain from so much disinformation? Check out our database of
Bias, Dark Money and Influence (BDMI):
BDMI database
Below we list a selection of the more egregious examples.
No 53: The secret Labour plot to silence migrant hotel critics: Whitehall internet monitoring unit complains to social media giants over posts criticising asylum seekers, immigration and two-tier policing
No 52: DAN HODGES: Questions over Keir Starmer's role in Jimmy Savile saga stretch his credibility to breaking point. If he's happy to dish it out he had better show he can take it
No 51: Count us out! Teenagers given the power to vote by Starmer say 16 and 17-year-olds SHOULDN'T be allowed to - because they can't be trusted and it's too hard to decide
No 50: Angela Rayner to put 'BANTER POLICE' in your office: Watch what you say by the water cooler! Workers' rights Bill pressures firms to spy on 'inappropriate' conversations
No 49: Reeves 'set to raise taxes' to fund Starmer benefits surrender that will not strip ANYONE of their handouts and blows another hole in UK finances